New federal right would protect an artist’s “style” beyond registered works — “inspiration is fine, impersonation is not.”

Parody, fan art and AI research carved out — Adobe: “the creative economy is worth $1.2 trillion, about 4.2% of U.S. GDP.”

U.S. lawmakers have introduced a bill to curb the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to copy an artist’s signature style and exploit it commercially without permission. The driving concern: with a single text prompt, anyone can now mass-produce images mimicking a specific artist’s signature style — at no cost, in seconds, and without consent or compensation — and flood the marketplace with them. While copyright protects individual registered works, the style an artist spends years refining has fallen through a legal gap that no statute addresses. This bill aims squarely at that gap.

美 의회, ‘AI 화풍 도용’ 정조준…초당적 ‘크리에이터법’ 발의, 어도비가 전면에
미국 의회 생성 AI가 화가의 고유한 작풍을 무단으로 베껴 상업적으로 활용하는 행위에 제동을 거는 법안 발의. 특히, 작가 ‘스타일(Style)’ 자체는 어떤 법의 보호도 받지 못하는 현실 정조준

The measure, known as the CREATOR Act (Creative Rights for Artists’ Technique and Originality Are Reserved Act), would give visual artists a way to fight back when their style is imitated without authorization. According to the media outlet Axios, the bill was introduced by a bipartisan group of House members: Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas), Yvette D. Clarke (D-N.Y.), Burgess Owens (R-Utah) and Valerie P. Foushee (D-N.C.). Imaging and design software maker Adobe has stepped to the front of the effort to back it.